Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978

WE ASK THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TO OVERTURN
STUMP V. SPARKMAN

A judge can be held liable when his actions complained of reflect the absence of any of the normal attributes of a judicial proceeding, and those actions led to the sexual exploitation of a child.

PETITION TO CHALLENGE APPLICATION OF JUDICIAL IMMUNITY IN MATTERS INVOLVING THE SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF A MINOR

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner asks the court to overturn Stump v. Sparkman and hold that judges are not immune when they use their judicial power to sexually exploit a child.

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

The Court has authority under the U.S. Constitution because the acts occurred here and involve protecting a minor’s rights under child protection laws, the Constitution, or human rights laws.

III. LEGAL BASIS FOR RELIEF

1.Judicial Immunity Limitations – Judicial immunity does not extend to acts taken in the clear absence of jurisdiction or outside the scope of judicial function.

2.Child Protection Principles – The welfare of the child is paramount, and no immunity should shield conduct that violates these protections.

3.Due Process Violations – Judges who engage in Judicial malfeasance to change a child’s gender are liable because their actions exceed judicial function.

IV. RELIEF REQUESTED

Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court:

1.Declare that judicial immunity does not apply when a Judge engages in malfeasance to amend the Gender of a child.

2.Permit civil action for damages and/or injunctive relief against a Judge who has ordered the sexual mutilation of a child.

3.Grant any other relief deemed just and proper to protect the rights and welfare of the minor.

SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FORM PLEASE AND STATE IN THE SUBJECT BOX THAT YOU SUPPORT VERONICA’S LAW. ADD ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION YOU WISH TO SHARE IN THE MESSAGE BOX